TPP Weekly Rewind

TPP Week-In-Review
- On Monday, Sam chastised the US Intelligence community in favor of The Washington Post, and TPP intern Charles wondered how much we can reasonably limit free speech
- On Tuesday, TPP intern Jonathan suggested that many citizens have a bad memory
- On Wednesday, TPP intern Han distinguished three conceptions of ‘just desert’ in light of a New York Times‘ op-ed lamenting a rising American aristocracy, and then suggested another justification for state laws criminalizing HIV transmission
- On Thursday, TPP intern Charles argued that we ought to allow the construction of a mosque and Muslim community center two blocks from Ground Zero; Luke examined Republican Senator Lindsey Graham’s decision to support Elena Kagan’s nomination to the Supreme Court, despite ideological differences; and TPP intern Ethan insisted that the argument over national standards in public education belies a debate over the nature of education itself
- On Friday, TPP intern Han considered pointed to a Newsweek story in order to connect the concepts of fairness and desert, and Jake criticized moral naturalism for failing to answer an important question
In Others’ Words
- Michael Smith asserted in an op-ed for News Herald that modern liberals are not who they think they are
- In the ‘Religion and Ethics’ section of ABC’s Australian site, Stanley Hauerwas claimed that America’s god is dying
- Robert Wolff shared another installment of his introductory series on game theory and related fields
- Herbert Gintis at Cato Unbound explained an interesting relationship between evolutionary biology and political philosophy
- Phil at A Very Public Sociologist discussed the relationship between radical politics and listening
- Youtube user CollegeBinary posted a three-minute summary of Immanuel Kant
- Some folks on Facebook suggested an interesting way to put the corpus of Ayn Rand to good use
- Neil Levy at Practical Ethics examined a recent study (which TPP has written about previously) that suggests people are often more likely to believe false information than true information
- Stephen Neale spoke about meaning and interpretation for Philosophy Bites‘ newest podcast
Comments
Leave a Reply




Share