“I’m confused, half blind, and sure I’m right!” | The Public Philosopher

“I’m confused, half blind, and sure I’m right!”

how stupid do you think we are

If you’re in the mood to be depressed, a story in The Boston Globe reports on a psychological phenomenon known as “backfire.”

Recently, a few political scientists have begun to discover a human tendency deeply discouraging to anyone with faith in the power of information. It’s this: Facts don’t necessarily have the power to change our minds. In fact, quite the opposite. In a series of studies in 2005 and 2006, researchers at the University of Michigan found that when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds. In fact, they often became even more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts, they found, were not curing misinformation. Like an underpowered antibiotic, facts could actually make misinformation even stronger.

The full article deserves a read, if you have the constitution for it (it just gets more and more depressing).  One of its conclusions is that this phenomenon “bodes ill for democracy.”  No doubt it does, but really, it bodes ill for humanity in general.  After all, any form of government is ultimately run by people, people who apparently aren’t as open to new information as we would like.  Maybe after reading such an article, the best we can hope is that, as Churchill said, “democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those others that have been tried from time to time.”  Let’s hope it’s enough to get us through the night.

-Han

Image used under a Creative Commons attribution license from Flickr user Andrew Aliferis

Comments

2 Responses to ““I’m confused, half blind, and sure I’m right!””

  1. Charles on July 14th, 2010 12:35 am

    I’m sure a great deal of this has to do with the fact that nobody has the final word in social science. In the natural sciences, there are only a handful of plausible mechanisms to explain a certain phenomenon. The social sciences are massively more open-ended, and the same facts can be interpreted in radically different ways depending on one’s values and assumptions about how humans and society operate.

  2. Becky Sharp on July 15th, 2010 4:12 am

    I think the temptation of both major political parties, or even left-leaning and right-leaning individuals, is to use facts like ammunition. And of course this causes people to feel like their beliefs (not just misinformation) are under attack. If only there were a way to reinform people without giving that impression…

    I did find it amusing that people who had a self-esteem boost just before hearing “the facts” were more likely to be open to new information. What politicians have to do now is reach across the aisle for a little ego-stroking.

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us