Philosophy and abstraction via The Stone

What kind of philosophy is good for the state?

NYT’s The Stone published what is, to me, the first piece that effectively delivers on their mission. The question at hand is why philosophy appears to be  so remote an inaccessible to those outside of academic philosophy. I’ll address the first response, by Alexander George.

The dilemma is that philosophical questions are of broad interest. Unfortunately, unlike the hard sciences, philosophy can rarely present concrete courses of action.

Philosophical questions can present themselves to us with an immediacy, even an urgency, that can seem to demand a correspondingly accessible answer.  High philosophy usually fails to deliver such accessibility — and so the dismay that borders on a sense of betrayal.

Instead, philosophy tends to spin into every-greater abstraction. George argues that this abstraction leads necessarily to the incredibly intricate theoretical work done by academics.

The approach that involves the search for “new discoveries” of a theoretical nature is now ascendant.  Since the fruits of this kind of work, even when conveyed in the clearest of terms, can well be remote and difficult, we have here another ingredient of the sense that philosophy spends too much time scrutinizing the sun.

I might add an additional reason: academics must publish, and having something worthwhile to say often requires some sort of theoretical innovation.

This question is of strong interest to the mission of The Public Philosopher. If there are to be philosophical/ethical answers to political questions, philosophy will have to supply them in widely comprehensible language. Ultimately, there will always be a layer of abstraction that goes beyond the needs of a population in resolving its everyday challenges. Unfortunately, it’s that abstraction that can often the locus of debate in academic circles.

-John

Photo by Flickr user kevindooley used under a Creative Commons Attribution license.

Related posts:

  1. The perils of philosophy in public
  2. Philosophy for second graders
  3. Obama’s governing philosophy
  4. Stephen Walt on blogging
  5. Joseph Nye: America needs this blog…

Comments

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us