Should government protect consumer safety?

As a long-time Toyota owner myself, it’s been difficult to see the rash of recalls facing the Japanese automaker.  But it’s raised an interesting question about the role of the government in a free market.  The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, for example, has received a good deal of criticism for not following up on evidence of braking problems in Toyota cars as early as 2007.  But the question remains: should government intervene in the free market to protect consumer safety?  And if so, to what degree?  Must government test everything that comes to market?  Every product line?  Or every single product?  Or should government not intervene at all?  Is the free flow of information (especially in the internet age) enough to get companies themselves to ensure the safety of their own products?

Discuss…

-Marc

Related posts:

  1. The debate over net neutrality
  2. Consumer competence
  3. Who is responsible for cleaning up this mess?
  4. Everybody knows somebody . . .
  5. Shielding “the cloud” from the government

Comments

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us