An honest question for Wieseltier

I debated whether the bizarre takedown of Andrew Sullivan by Leon Wieseltier might be one of those situations where the less said, the better.  The only rebuttal that seems necessary is this one: Under what circumstances might one criticize ” the Goldfarb-Krauthammer wing” (in the Sullivan original, of conservatism, not of Judaism) without falling into some kind of trap of anti-semitism?

The article may be worthwhile, though, to delight in Wieseltier’s takedown of blogging generally due to “the divine right of bloggers to exempt themselves from the interrogations of editors.”  It’s my understanding that Wieseltier himself is somehow contractually exempt from editing in TNR, which explains a lot as far as it goes.

-John

Related posts:

  1. A question answered
  2. Skirting the real question
  3. MGM and Massachusetts

Comments

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us