Death by health care

Jake has previously written about policy prioritization, an issue that is now rearing its ugly head in the health care debate.  Earl Pomeroy (D-ND) is complaining that the health care debate is dragging on too long, meaning that “a number of other issues that haven’t been able to get enough attention.”

How important are procedural limits on how long an issue can be heard?  Should there be egalitarian procedural justice to ensure that every issue is heard for the same amount of time?  Or do some issues deserve more consideration than others?

-Sam

Related posts:

  1. Give me health care, or give me death
  2. Singer on health care rationing
  3. “Dalrymple” on health care
  4. Who should pay for health care reform?
  5. Was health care reform illegal?

January 15, 2010 · Filed Under Sam

Share

Comments

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind



  •

  • Share us