The law and the death penalty

The New York Times has an interesting discussion on the criminal sentencing of juveniles and the mentally handicapped, a topic we’ve discussed extensively here.  The article explores the difference between rules and standards in sentencing.  For example, “if you commit murder even hours before your 18th birthday, you cannot be put to death for your crime. The same killing a few hours later may be a capital offense.”  That is a clear rule about when to use the death penalty.  A similar Supreme Court ruling bars the execution of the mentally disabled.  According to the article, while this sounds like a rule, it is actually a standard, because determining mental handicap is somewhat subjective, as compared with proving age.  In the end, all of these debates link back to responsibility – at what age and level of mental capacity can we call people responsible for the crimes they commit?

-Marc

Related posts:

  1. Is it right to put an accomplice to death?
  2. Coates on capital punishment
  3. How young is too young for a life sentence?
  4. The world court
  5. Swine flu and global justice

Comments

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us