Food for thought

Philosopher Gary Steiner has an interesting article in Sunday’s New York Times on whether it is wrong “to kill animals for human consumption.” Steiner comments on how

These uses of animals are so institutionalized, so normalized, in our society that it is difficult to find the critical distance needed to see them as the horrors that they are

Regardless of how one feels on the issue of eating meat, Steiner’s argument illustrates the importance of public philosophy. The fact that it is easy to become desensitized to the ethical choices we face in our day-to-day lives illustrates why philosophy is often dismissed as irrelevant and overly abstract and consequently why it is still so important.

-Luke

Related posts:

  1. Can government ban fast food?
  2. Law & animal rights
  3. On oil & the environment
  4. More on Michael Vick
  5. Coates on capital punishment

Comments

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU, a former Fulbright Scholar to Mauritius, and a graduate of Cornell University. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from the University of Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in Washington and a graduate of the University of Chicago. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow with the U.S. government and a graduate of Princeton University. He earned an MPhil in Political Theory from the University of Oxford.

  • John Rood is the founder of Next Step Test Preparation and a graduate of Michigan State University. He has an AM in Political Theory from the University of Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is a student at Carleton College, pursuing a double major in Philosophy and Political Science.


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us