States’ rights and “geographic minorities”

Josh Patashnik, writing for The Plank, has an impassioned defense of states’ rights against the liberal bloggers who have of late disparaged them as the intellectual domain of so-called “Tenthers.”  He has some trouble with the objection that no other minority group is protected in the way that “geographic minorities” are:

But geographic minorities have a special place in American history.  After all, the Union came close to dissolving along geographic lines, something that can be said of no other demographic cleavage.  And the West developed in no small part because of the tireless efforts of senators like Arizona’s Carl Hayden and New Mexico’s Clinton Anderson–whose influence flowed precisely from the Senate’s egalitarian treatment of states.  The region and the country are better off as a result.

-John

Related posts:

  1. Is there a states’ rights issue in the Affordable Care Act?
  2. More on state sovereignty
  3. Human rights organization unites with human rights antagonist
  4. Healthcare, Rights, and Human Rights
  5. Let’s talk about rights, baby

Comments

One Response to “States’ rights and “geographic minorities””

  1. More on state sovereignty : The Public Philosopher on October 14th, 2009 10:41 am

    [...] I posted a quick link to Josh Patashnik’s defense of states’ [...]

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us