Irving Kristol

The intellectual godfather of neoconservatism

Irving Kristol died Friday.  From the 1950s through the 1990s, Kristol’s thought characterized a strain of conservatism known as neoconservatism.  It is fascinating intellectual story.  The evolution of liberal, Trostskyite intellectuals – who were, as Kristol famously described, “mugged by reality” – into conservative standard-bearers.

This is a description that summarized Kristol’s own experiences as a New Deal Democrat who questioned the means (though not necessarily the ends) of President Johnson’s Great Society.  Kristol and neoconservatives like him believed in the limits of social policy, that is, the extent to which government programs can produce positive results without unintended negative consequences.  With Kristol’s help, this idea came to animate Ronald Reagan’s presidency, the high point for neoconservativism.

In his writing Kristol took his beliefs to the extreme, but it would be false to say he was far to the right in a traditional sense.  Neoconservatism never did fit well in the left-right spectrum that commentators use to simplify American politics.  At least in its pre-George W. Bush form, it was in many ways an ideology of liberal ends through conservative means.

Summarizing his intellectual history, Kristol writes, “Ever since I can remember I’ve been a neo-something: a neo-Marxist, a neo-Trotskyist, a neo-liberal, a neo-conservative…I’m going to end up a neo. Just neo, that’s all. Neo-dash-nothing.”  For today’s political debate, this may be his most important thought.  Neoconservatism has thrived most when challenging a status quo – of the right or the left.  Kristol writes that his two most significant intellectual influences were Lionel Trilling, “a skeptical liberal,” and Leo Strauss, “a skeptical conservative.”  In becoming the status quo of the Bush Administration, the ideology it seems lost this skeptical nature.  Modern day neoconservatives would do well to relearn it.

To facilitate this task, The Public Philosopher offers some Irving Kristol required reading:

Conservative intellectuals on Kristol

William F. Buckley – “Irving’s Whodunit”

John Podhoretz – “Irving Kristol, 1920-2009″

Newspaper editorials

The New York Times

The Wall Street Journal

The Washington Post

Irving Kristol in his own words

“The Neoconservative Persuasion”

“My ‘Public Interest’”

Wall Street Journal highlights

Commentary archive

Public Interest archive

-Marc

Related posts:

  1. Irving Kristol, from left to right
  2. Where are the liberal demagogues?
  3. Kristol on “Don’t Ask”
  4. Compromise
  5. Does symbolism matter in the pursuit of justice?

Comments

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us