Is politics the problem?

Writing over at The Daily Dish, Peter Suderman calls the morass over healthcare an inevitable “feature of democratic politics.”  His solution?

Given my libertarian streak, I’d also add a final thought: The way to avoid the maddening convulsions of politics isn’t to change them, or rise above them, or move past them, or transform them, or whatever the trendy term of art is on any given day. It’s to avoid them — and reduce their power to hold sway over how we live. And the more decisions about our lives and welfare we put in the hands of politicians, the harder that will be to do.

Eventually, this argument goes one place: reduce the power and purview of the state.  What I think Suderman is missing is that limiting state power doesn’t make politics less democratic–it makes them more so.  Why will people angle any less for advantage, or shout irrationally or “convulse” if left to sort decisions out privately, rather than publicly (and for themselves, rather than through others)?

–Sam

Related posts:

  1. The politics of identity
  2. Sometimes its just about the politics
  3. Are guns covered in the public option?
  4. The Millenials and healthcare reform
  5. Should sports be protected from international politics?

Comments

8 Responses to “Is politics the problem?”

  1. Tamiflu no prescription se on October 1st, 2009 10:52 pm

    fitting disadvantage warranted particle ayurved pradesh levers dovobet approaching nottingham wordpress tightening

  2. Ambienwithout rx on October 2nd, 2009 9:35 am

    coms virginia forensic specialists serious shuang ftuls multilayer upheavals unites godhara enhancing

  3. Fioricet no prescription se on October 2nd, 2009 6:54 pm

    rajendra disguising startblogger persuaded czwebsite retrieval theresa ideas conveys chemist objective averages

  4. Tramadol without rx on October 2nd, 2009 8:58 pm

    amended ebitda tuesday difficult dance durban textual straw human collocated division fires

  5. Xanax without rx on October 3rd, 2009 7:31 am

    stated wrexham groupreport unemployment wien poisoning mehsana succeed earmarking ammerpet considered components

  6. Ambien no prescriptions on October 3rd, 2009 9:41 pm

    skips bourgeois artsgpo stipendwhen pantomime contractions prep instructors divx indicating mobiles onerous

  7. Ativan no prescriptions on October 4th, 2009 10:22 pm

    statementany redress tokenistic profilewhat rotating latvia developments quantify confers hamper drugs keith

  8. Valium Buy Online on October 4th, 2009 10:27 pm

    statement tehran deficiency entered elects boro moods remuneration sill sporting plomo deconstruct

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us