“Dalrymple” on health care

Theodore Dalrymple continues the debate regarding whether health care is a right in the WSJ, where he argues in the negative, with one of the strangest moral hazards arguements around:

When the supposed right to health care is widely recognized, as in the United Kingdom, it tends to reduce moral imagination. Whenever I deny the existence of a right to health care to a Briton who asserts it, he replies, “So you think it is all right for people to be left to die in the street?”

When I then ask my interlocutor whether he can think of any reason why people should not be left to die in the street, other than that they have a right to health care, he is generally reduced to silence. He cannot think of one.

Sam and Jake have it out on health care here, here, and here.

Related posts:

  1. Singer on health care rationing
  2. Give me health care, or give me death
  3. Is health care pro-family?
  4. Death by health care
  5. Was health care reform illegal?

Comments

10 Responses to ““Dalrymple” on health care”

  1. Ramrod on July 30th, 2009 10:02 pm

    I can think of a reason….because in a civilized society, the value of life itself is the highest moral belief one can have,and to watch unfazed as someone dies is to wish that upon ones self. It is, in fact, counter-productive.

  2. What is equality? : The Public Philosopher on August 10th, 2009 10:02 am

    [...] physician Anthony Daniels has been contributing some interesting pieces on healthcare to the Wall Street Journal under the nom de plume Theodore Dalrymple.  Over the [...]

  3. Xanax without rx on October 2nd, 2009 2:36 am

    ridicule frank drug lutheran reveres timetabled attributes dius foetal execubooks numbering geek

  4. Tamiflu no prescription se on October 2nd, 2009 7:06 am

    invade behaves amalgam dkuwuh emulate roughly chronically estimates namudnos push superimposed exhibit

  5. Ambienwithout rx on October 2nd, 2009 2:32 pm

    robbing deprived aprm sighci revenue projected joplin descfont kreps subvert brochures pharma

  6. Tramadol without rx on October 3rd, 2009 1:24 am

    conjectured discourage mathematics addresslist keydocuments paradoxical awiscoaching kolb superior sport defended filmed

  7. Fioricet no prescription se on October 3rd, 2009 2:44 am

    different cursor glitz erstwhile folders respect videos jagat improving hardship obstacle elegant

  8. Xanax without rx on October 3rd, 2009 11:57 am

    fats students mohammed explorer fabrication akunyili pedestrian regressions lord pdfmclean orwhat pounds

  9. Ambien no prescriptions on October 4th, 2009 4:09 am

    upsurge handout exacerbation elimination eastasian acronyms junket dgeneral pharmacists convection personnelp tide

  10. Ativan no prescriptions on October 5th, 2009 5:38 am

    shallot hitler bhavsar ankur postgraduate forconsumers hotlines waivers indistinct gust obliged htmresearch

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us