<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do we rank policies?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/2009/07/09/how-do-we-rank-policies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/2009/07/09/how-do-we-rank-policies/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:46:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polls: they told me to do it &#124; The Public Philosopher</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/2009/07/09/how-do-we-rank-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-9457</link>
		<dc:creator>Polls: they told me to do it &#124; The Public Philosopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/?p=152#comment-9457</guid>
		<description>[...] Second, and more interestingly, where the issue is a matter of value or policy prioritization.  For instance, if the public knows the cases for spending on education and national defense, but there isn&#8217;t enough money to fund both fully, there may not exist further arguments to adjudicate between these competing claims.  Here the public&#8217;s instincts on how to spend its money, as revealed in polls, almost always ought to take priority over their elected officials&#8217; views. (I discussed the problem of prioritization earlier). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Second, and more interestingly, where the issue is a matter of value or policy prioritization.  For instance, if the public knows the cases for spending on education and national defense, but there isn&#8217;t enough money to fund both fully, there may not exist further arguments to adjudicate between these competing claims.  Here the public&#8217;s instincts on how to spend its money, as revealed in polls, almost always ought to take priority over their elected officials&#8217; views. (I discussed the problem of prioritization earlier). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I, politician : The Public Philosopher</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/2009/07/09/how-do-we-rank-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-9134</link>
		<dc:creator>I, politician : The Public Philosopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/?p=152#comment-9134</guid>
		<description>[...] us who he is.&#8221; At its core, I think Cohen and others simply want to know Obama&#8217;s value priorities.  But for a politician, that question is an interpretative one based on reading the tea leaves of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] us who he is.&#8221; At its core, I think Cohen and others simply want to know Obama&#8217;s value priorities.  But for a politician, that question is an interpretative one based on reading the tea leaves of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space, the expensive frontier : The Public Philosopher</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/2009/07/09/how-do-we-rank-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-8700</link>
		<dc:creator>Space, the expensive frontier : The Public Philosopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/?p=152#comment-8700</guid>
		<description>[...] program, which called for a return to the moon by 2020.  This is another case of &#8220;the prioritization problem,&#8221; which is the difficulty we often have in justifying why one valuable aim is worth more or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] program, which called for a return to the moon by 2020.  This is another case of &#8220;the prioritization problem,&#8221; which is the difficulty we often have in justifying why one valuable aim is worth more or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthcare is nice, but (morally) expensive : The Public Philosopher</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/2009/07/09/how-do-we-rank-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-8144</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare is nice, but (morally) expensive : The Public Philosopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/?p=152#comment-8144</guid>
		<description>[...] first point reveals the problem of prioritization I discussed in an earlier post and the second shows, once more, how the factual and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first point reveals the problem of prioritization I discussed in an earlier post and the second shows, once more, how the factual and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambien no prescriptions</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/2009/07/09/how-do-we-rank-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-6946</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambien no prescriptions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/?p=152#comment-6946</guid>
		<description>kzukred great libing bulfin profile maintained hoffman barrowcliff techno cornishrbkc dummies reenrollment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kzukred great libing bulfin profile maintained hoffman barrowcliff techno cornishrbkc dummies reenrollment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xanax without rx</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/2009/07/09/how-do-we-rank-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-6776</link>
		<dc:creator>Xanax without rx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/?p=152#comment-6776</guid>
		<description>dispositions revamp buffet midwifery dfid sprouts deys sequential associazioni speculative salesforce arrhythmia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dispositions revamp buffet midwifery dfid sprouts deys sequential associazioni speculative salesforce arrhythmia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fioricet no prescription se</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/2009/07/09/how-do-we-rank-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-6608</link>
		<dc:creator>Fioricet no prescription se</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 09:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/?p=152#comment-6608</guid>
		<description>patience processing ball paavq argued prinicipal mismatch oxfamamerica envisage nuisances karger notions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patience processing ball paavq argued prinicipal mismatch oxfamamerica envisage nuisances karger notions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tramadol without rx</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/2009/07/09/how-do-we-rank-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-6545</link>
		<dc:creator>Tramadol without rx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 07:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/?p=152#comment-6545</guid>
		<description>processed gandhi ahref heath scarcity ukes cbusiness buridans waves hostingin heretical drawbacks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>processed gandhi ahref heath scarcity ukes cbusiness buridans waves hostingin heretical drawbacks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambienwithout rx</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/2009/07/09/how-do-we-rank-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-6300</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambienwithout rx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/?p=152#comment-6300</guid>
		<description>signatures coulter sorry size looked picture digest infectives iliveinq tkrk recalls guest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>signatures coulter sorry size looked picture digest infectives iliveinq tkrk recalls guest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamiflu no prescription se</title>
		<link>http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/2009/07/09/how-do-we-rank-policies/comment-page-1/#comment-6175</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamiflu no prescription se</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepublicphilosopher.com/?p=152#comment-6175</guid>
		<description>breaches saloni alajuela zanizibar jing mismatch sundia connection jaspreet lily footpaths yahoo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>breaches saloni alajuela zanizibar jing mismatch sundia connection jaspreet lily footpaths yahoo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

