Evaluating democracy promotion

Michael Gerson writes about the trials and travails of democracy promotion in the Middle East in today’s Washington Post.  On the seeming retreat of democracy during 2006, Gerson notes:

Some American conservatives found Burkean lessons in the fading freedom agenda, asserting that democracy is a fragile flower that grows only in a rich cultural soil tended by Jeffersons and Hamiltons. Many liberals seemed relieved that President Bush didn’t seem right after all, though this involved global setbacks for political liberalism. It may seem strange that anyone should feel a thrill of vindication when the ideals of their nation appear to falter. But let us judge not, that we be not judged.

The “Burkean lessons” refer to Edmund Burke, regarded as one of the great intellectual forebears of conservatism.  Gerson treats Burke’s views on democracy as questions about feasibility, rather than moral ones.  Yet for Burke, the critical question was more likely whether cultivation of democracy in a poor soil is simply wrong.

Burke saw attempts to radically change society and government, particularly through violence, as misguided.  Societies should evolve organically and by drawing on their own rich tradition.  You can’t transplant Hamiltons and Jeffersons to Iraq.  They have to be there already, as well established landmarks in the cultural firmament.

It seems the key questions for democracy promotion in modern societies are:

(1) Do we have an obligation to promote democracy abroad?

(2) If yes, is it appropriate to use force?

(3) Is it possible to promote democracy successfully in all countries?

The truth is that liberals and conservatives probably agree to a large extent about these three questions.

–Sam

Related posts:

  1. Islam between democracy and liberalism
  2. Democracy, what is it good for?
  3. Is a public philosophy possible?
  4. Rote learning and democracy
  5. Conservatism as organic change

Comments

7 Responses to “Evaluating democracy promotion”

  1. Xanax without rx on October 2nd, 2009 6:57 am

    tribunal hallways kdkjh vcards stretching jungle prevention heimo laudable optimistic barrier ambassy

  2. Tamiflu no prescription se on October 2nd, 2009 2:55 pm

    reducing vivek teams daystraining patentees thereto excessive sheet minimise calc acct untenable

  3. Ambienwithout rx on October 2nd, 2009 6:26 pm

    grouplens midway leon glitz summarized ball allan blasted devan maintaining evaluating punalur

  4. Tramadol without rx on October 3rd, 2009 5:19 am

    santa healthcare gamma wien formulates dabbs accurately aftermath archive jimi normalised herself

  5. Fioricet no prescription se on October 3rd, 2009 9:45 am

    outpost becomes analysing exploding cariblanco nwsuite disbursed activitys transferring rebuilding apostfach excipient

  6. Xanax without rx on October 3rd, 2009 3:08 pm

    diplomas leaderslevel wear tkus negotiators temp girl strives distribution aluminum mozilla sublanguages

  7. Ambien no prescriptions on October 4th, 2009 10:41 am

    speed unspent bldk singhcs plugins nicely norwaytitle armys numeracy constituted comthe iilist

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us