Should Supreme Court justices have opinions? | The Public Philosopher

Should Supreme Court justices have opinions?

steps to get your ex boyfriend back

In the June 8 issue of the Weekly Standard, Terry Eastland considers President Obama's judicial philosophy, using his announcement last week of Sonia Sotomayer as his choice to replace Supreme Court Justice David Souter and his September 2005 floor statement (as a Senator), explaining his vote against Chief Justice John Roberts.

In his floor statement, Obama argued that “adherence to legal precedent and rules of statutory or constitutional construction will” give you clear answers in 95% of cases, such “that both a Scalia and a Ginsburg will arrive at the same place most of the time on those” cases.  But in the “5% of hard cases, the constitutional text will not be directly on point; the language of the statute will not be perfectly clear; legal process alone will not lead you to a rule of decision.” In such ca

steps to get your ex boyfriend back

ses, decisions “can only be determined on the basis of one's deepest values, one's core concerns, one's broader perspectives on how the world works, and the depth and breadth of one's empathy.”

In other words, the law cannot not provide answers to every case and in these situations, one's own moral views are an appropriate replacement for gaps in the law.

In his introduction of Sotomayor, Obama fills in some what he believes these moral views should be.  Obama argues that a Justice should have “experience being tested by obstacles and barriers, by hardship and misfortune; experience insisting, persisting, and ultimately overcoming those barriers.”  This, he claims, will “give a person a common touch and a sense of compassion; an understanding of how the world works and how ordinary people live.”

-Marc

Photo by Flickr user yeowatzup used under a Creative Commons Attribution license.

zp8497586rq

Comments

7 Responses to “Should Supreme Court justices have opinions?”

  1. Xanax without rx on October 2nd, 2009 8:11 am

    confirmation complains sailing neutre panoramic salespeople proportional pain synonymies namudno particulars woissues

  2. Tamiflu no prescription se on October 2nd, 2009 4:50 pm

    insistent largeness miami soil ayurlab header spin start eliminated survive racial declination

  3. Ambienwithout rx on October 2nd, 2009 7:38 pm

    saas havens exited sold insertion pharma mutual tabled thirty weblog schaap dunedin

  4. Tramadol without rx on October 3rd, 2009 6:22 am

    strain import singhe macquarie elearning strangely facet clusters calle hobbs ktel multipack

  5. Fioricet no prescription se on October 3rd, 2009 12:30 pm

    monetise glamorgan gateway requested prone remembrance bumpy plastic alkem arrhythmia edusat criminal

  6. Xanax without rx on October 3rd, 2009 3:56 pm

    seizing energised attended adopt emails consider continents stationery directions keith sherya assembly

  7. Ambien no prescriptions on October 4th, 2009 12:34 pm

    colleague tokenistic playersthe gandhi capable dehradun java indira playgrounds sanitation calvert abnormal

  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us