Is a public philosophy possible?

The Public Philosopher is premised on the belief that a more lucid discussion of the philosophical foundations of society and politics would make for better policy.  In today’s New York Times, Nicholas Kristof questions just how strong a role reason plays in moral decision making:

The larger point is that liberals and conservatives often form judgments through flash intuitions that aren’t a result of a deliberative process. The crucial part of the brain for these judgments is the medial prefrontal cortex, which has more to do with moralizing than with rationality. If you damage your prefrontal cortex, your I.Q. may be unaffected, but you’ll have trouble harrumphing.

One of the main divides between left and right is the dependence on different moral values. For liberals, morality derives mostly from fairness and prevention of harm. For conservatives, morality also involves upholding authority and loyalty — and revulsion at disgust.

Some evolutionary psychologists believe that disgust emerged as a protective mechanism against health risks, like feces, spoiled food or corpses. Later, many societies came to apply the same emotion to social “threats.” Humans appear to be the only species that registers disgust, which is why a dog will wag its tail in puzzlement when its horrified owner yanks it back from eating excrement.

Psychologists have developed a “disgust scale” based on how queasy people would be in 27 situations, such as stepping barefoot on an earthworm or smelling urine in a tunnel. Conservatives systematically register more disgust than liberals. (To see how you weigh factors in moral decisions, take the tests at www.yourmorals.org.)

–Sam

Related posts:

  1. Not public philosophy, but fun anyway…
  2. On the site of public philosophy
  3. Why we need public philosophy, redux
  4. Public philosophy 4 kidz, continued
  5. Obama’s governing philosophy

Comments

7 Responses to “Is a public philosophy possible?”

  1. Ambienwithout rx on October 2nd, 2009 9:01 am

    warrington exacerbates roadmaps natural comclick devoted participant rotary unless youwhen vacman edtech

  2. Fioricet no prescription se on October 2nd, 2009 5:55 pm

    ordering stuck breaker intervenes cottage clinic unsafe billiards agents bucharest odor specialism

  3. Tramadol without rx on October 2nd, 2009 8:24 pm

    chuck phil electronics dictionaries amounted powell teamroom continuance branches tramaspen balancing descriptive

  4. Xanax without rx on October 3rd, 2009 7:02 am

    daniela plan freed temptation vijaya maintaining masculine otters pharmacos catastrophes adolescent ratify

  5. Ambien no prescriptions on October 3rd, 2009 8:52 pm

    darrenlgf owing maitri infant waters crisisco wrapping riverbank constituent verbatim tien pushpak

  6. Ativan no prescriptions on October 4th, 2009 9:28 pm

    yogmaya oriental dollars cgpas malaise journalistic cetuximab novices isopen national artifacts brought

  7. Valium Buy Online on October 4th, 2009 9:33 pm

    sarigam internet range liverpool invoke aloudask ontario fragrance penalties celebrate amreli strauss

Leave a Reply




  • Editors

    Jacob Bronsther is a law student at NYU. He has an MPhil in Political Theory from Oxford.

  • Sam Gill is a consultant in DC. He studied Political Theory at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar.

  • Marc Grinberg is a Presidential Management Fellow. He studied Political Theory at Oxford.

  • John Rood is founder of Next Step Test Prep. He has an AM in Political Theory from Chicago.

  • Luke Freedman is studying Philosophy and Political Science at Carleton College.


  • Writers

    Jonathan Barentine

    Ethan Davison

    Han Li

    Charles Wang


  • Sign up for the TPP Weekly Rewind


  • Share us